@conference {BT101,
	title = {BT102: Cycles of Scientific Investigation in Discourse - Machine Reading Methods for the Primary Research Contributions of a Paper},
	booktitle = {International Conference on Biomedical Ontology and BioCreative (ICBO BioCreative 2016)},
	series = {Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Biological Ontology and BioCreative (2016)},
	year = {2016},
	month = {11/30/16},
	publisher = {CEUR-ws.org Volume 1747},
	organization = {CEUR-ws.org Volume 1747},
	abstract = {<p>We describe a novel approach to machine reading of the primary scientific literature. We treat a description of an experiment as a discourse, viewing a scientific corpus not merely into a collection of documents, but also an extended conversation formed by the collective set of experiments, their introductions and interpretations. This paper introduces this approach as a methodology called {\textquoteleft}Cycles of Scientific Investigation in Discourse{\textquoteright} (CoSID). In CoSID, we capture the central conceptual structure of a paper as a series of nested reasoning loops, composed of passages in results sections, which describe individual research findings. We ground our work with a number of worked examples based on data from the MINTACT and Pathway Logic databases, and illustrate the idea in the context of machine-enable biocuration.</p>
},
	url = {http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1747/BT102_ICBO2016.pdf},
	author = {Gully A. Burns and Anita de Waard and Pradeep Dasigi and Eduard H. Hovy}
}
